Showing posts with label Brutality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Brutality. Show all posts

Thursday, March 19, 2015

Stand by for Police Brutality

When Cop Watching isn't enough

So many times when you watch a police brutality video or see a report of it in the news you see or hear about witnesses that stood and watched the entire event, some even capturing it on cell phone cameras. One thing that always stands out to me is that no one intervened to keep the officers from inflicting more injury or death to suspects. I understand the fear of involving yourself when in the midst of police making arrests, but at some point the thought has to become, "Will I just stand here and watch these cops beat a man to death?"

Eric Garner's death in New York City, caught on cell phone video, had many people as witnesses to police using tactics that ended up killing the man, but yet they stood by and watched. Helplessly, many say, people are forced to watch acts of savagery and murder at the hands of police, but why? Is it fear? Is it a sense that police are suppose to be a force of protection and service to a community. Is it the sense of authority that people dare not question police policy, procedure, or practices. Who were the police protecting in Garner's case? He was selling loose cigarettes; untaxed, singles to customers and passerby's.
Why didn't the story that a man who was close to the incident was able to save his life by intervening in the attack surface? Because it didn't happen. Multiple people sat by and watched it happen.

The same is true of a woman beaten by a California Highway Patrolman. A motorist stopped to record what was happening but made no move to actually stop the law enforcement officer from assaulting the woman. And again recently with an officer who is seen striking a homeless man who was not resisting the officer with any force.

I do commend those that film these altercations and abuses,I feel that Cop Blockers and Cop Watchers have added a great deal into the issue of abuse and corruption by law enforcement, but I also feel that we need to move past just filming and start intervening when we see these abuses.

Tuesday, January 20, 2015

Growing Up Into War Culture

With the release of the film American Sniper, which chronicles the life and military career of Chris Kyle, an American sniper in the US military, I sat down to think of what are the effects of growing up in what I call "War Culture"? What influence does the constant barrage of pro war and pro military images, songs and the almost mandatory glorification and appreciation that must be bestowed upon those who "serve" have on individuals.
How does the use of militarism and imbued detached emotional conditioning in entertainment lend to this culture?

I think first I need to explain what I see as "War Culture"
War Culture is the constant inoculation of militarism and perpetual war to the people of the world. It is not an isolated subject and is seen in just about every country on earth. It is the conditioning through various means to make war seem as just another aspect of life. It is the systematic conditioning to raise new generations to believe that the only way man has lived is in this perpetual state of alarm or conflict. Through the entertainment industries we see video games, movies and music that revolve around the occupation of the military or its missions, in essence Propaganda. Through the political sphere it is a constant stream of fear manipulation and the misuse of resources for destruction rather than diplomacy. The schools teach the military conquests from their home countries and gloss over the destruction that resulted. Again this is not an isolated occurrence, it happens all over the world.

Those that were born in the US after 2001 have never known a time when the US military was not engaged in a conflict, war, occupation or mission in one or another Middle Eastern country. Those who were born after 2001 may never know of a time when the US military will not have some sort of presence or installation in these countries.

Those that were born in these Middle Eastern countries after 2001 have never known a time when there wasn't a foreign military moving into their homes and communities. They would not know a time when their family were not targets for violence by men from far away. They grow up into a system of seeing this everyday, their family fighting for their own homes and their own way of life and they follow into this mindset. It doesn't take too much of a leap of logic to see that when someone sees this behavior day in and day out from childhood that they would continue on with the cycle later in life.

Then too we can think of the child soldiers from some other countries. Those who have entered this "service" by voluntary means have also been in large part brought up into this War Culture. They have never known a time, most of them, that their fathers were not at war, that their homes have not been threatened or even that their minds not set to these actions by the learned behavior or expressions of their religious leaders.

Kids, in the US especially, are approached early in their lives to consider joining the gears of the war machine. They are fed the scripts and lies of recruiters who have to fill new boots as fast as they fill caskets. By high school age in the US a person is to have been familiarized to the concept of war, used to the blind obedience to authority and have had their heads filled with the idea of protecting freedom by killing whoever their government is fighting with at the moment.

The media and entertainment industries play a major role in this idea. Think about this past year, how many movies were released that were based around military and war themes. Unbroken, Monuments Men, The Boys of Abu Ghriab, Seal Team 8, Jarhead 2,Fort Bliss, Good Kill and many many more. Now what about the gaming industry. In recent years with the rise in military actions around the world the gaming industry has turned into putting out more and more titles that deal with war and militarism. Now there is a lot of debate about the effect the games have on the players, if they turn out to be any more or less violent than those that do not play those types of games. But the theory is still valid, as far as the desensitizing effect it may have. Getting used to shooting at another human, destroying homes businesses, taking orders from authority and doing so unquestionably. Titles like Call of Duty, Destiny, Fallout, Titanfall, all lend to this issue. Again this is still a disputed theory and has not been determined to be viable at all. It is only in mentioning this that I hope to illustrate the tendency of entertainment companies to follow events happening in the world and to bring about some sense of entertaining qualities of war and the military theme to each new generation.

{ Speaking with a friend on this theory as I am writing this he makes a notation that this theory, that violent images from games or movies can have an effect on the minds and responses of individuals, makes the case that if the theory were incorrect there would be no reason to sit your child in front of a television or use and audio program to help them learn certain traits or characteristics. Sesame Street being an example, it is said that the majority of parents feel that by allowing their child to view this show they hope to reinforce good behaviors and learning skills. IF this theory were true in this instance it would be true in the case for picking up violent behavior as well. }

Even before some kids make it to an age that playing these games or watching these movies become an option they are brought into the war culture through their public and private educations. The National Anthem in America is a song of the battle at Fort McHenry in Baltimore MD September 7th 1814. It is a song about battle, of war, glorifying the action and triumph of the American colonies from the invading British troops. This anthem, being recognized as a National Anthem of the US by a law signed on March 3, 1931 by President Herbert Hoover. This being one of the first encounters with the theme of war even on a subconscious level. But this isn't just left to schoolchildren any more, no the national anthem is played at most if not all major sporting events, public ceremonies, political events, funerals, weddings, birthdays, national holiday celebrations and in some areas just because people love to sing a song of war. Many other nation's national anthems depict war themes as well. Many calling for rivers of blood, domination over enemies, revolutions, the firing of weapons to defeat foes and the beating of war drums and superiority of the country in battle.
 The anthem of Algeria is a example of this: "We swear by the lightning that destroys, By the streams of generous blood being shed" 
"When we spoke, none listened to us, So we have taken the noise of gunpowder as our rhythm, And the sound of machine guns as our melody"
For more on Anthems used as the drums of war see here.


Then there are those parents that raise their children with an expectation of joining the military. With parents that wish to ship you off to either kill someone or die trying to do that, who needs enemies? Often heard are the pro war people, "I would be so proud if my son/daughter joined the military." Under this implication they are under a false impression that 1. the military fights for freedom or security and 2. that their career choice is somehow a service to the country. 


That being said, what do we see from the culture of war?

Being raised and seeing the media portray the figures and images of war, without the true nature of destruction that it leaves in it's wake has left us, the world, desensitized to it all. The ability to be entertained by the use of violence has disconnected us from the real tragedy of the brutality of war. The constant barrage of subdued tones of Patriotism means serving in the military, the threats of violence from those the defend the institution of war and of the military's that wage them to those who seek peace through diplomacy and free and open trade. The boogie men created by institutions of government that turn into the very real monsters they were meant to look like. All of these things have added to a culture that sees war as the health of the state, that sees heroism in being able to kill another human being, that sees patriotism and nationalism as the wanton release of all personal morals or beliefs in the name of orders.

The Glorification of soldiers and the illogical justification for actions that in any other setting are immoral and unjust is a hard barrier to break. Any attempt is usually met with a onslaught of defenders and a constant stream of physical violence and threats of violence, again a product of the culture. The almost mandatory subjection of oneself to a life of praise and glory being bestowed upon those who "serve".




*I used quotation marks when mentioning the word serve in relation to military members. This is because the false sense that they are serving a nation, a country, the citizens of a certain land. Their service is to the government imposed over that land and those people. It is true that the paycheck does come from the citizens but not by voluntary means, not as a signal of worth or seen value but it is coerced and forced from them by government mandate.

 
War begets War it is said. And it would be correct given the history of the world SO FAR. But we do have the capability to end the cycle of perpetual wars, unneeded killing and dying, destruction and conquest. I refuse to glorify or propagate a system of despicable behavior under a twisted logic. Hero's are not those that go along with immoral orders, they do not revel in killing other human beings, they do not use a justification cooked up by some other person or entity to inflict destruction and death.

















Wednesday, November 26, 2014

Ferguson on Fire: The State Still Wins


After Tuesday night’s Missouri Grand Jury decision to not indict Officer Darren Wilson for the shooting death of Michael Brown the streets filled with people. Protesters, Police, News Journalists, even the state National Guard was called in prior to the verdict being read, they were all out in full force. The following riots sparked by feelings of injustice, racism, and oppression of lower income individuals, and the rise in police brutality cases across the country quickly raged out of control.  As the live streams and news streams were coming in (I avoided social media for the most part) I had a few thoughts on the whole matter, and here I will explain those thoughts.
(1) A Person Is Dead, and no matter the outcome of the fight Officer Darren Wilson and Michael Brown were engaged in, it seems likely this end could not be avoided. When the life of any person is taken in such a manner it is always a loss for someone. Michael Brown had family, friends, neighbors, people who cared about him, and the same is true of Officer Wilson, this fact cannot be refuted. Thinking about this it seems that it is forgotten by the protesters and opposition to the refusal to indict Wilson.
(2) Protesters are misguided and wrong. The protests that began after Brown's death and now brought back to Ferguson are destructive to the wrong ends. It makes no logical sense to attack private property, to loot, set fire to or destroy the businesses and homes, cars and other property of other citizens in the community. It makes your “cause” unworthy if you take from others and do not address the root cause of the strife or reason for discontent. If these protesters had surrounded police stations, fire stations, city hall, and other city properties, and had refused to let them operate as usual, this could have turned out well. If these protesters had staged a protest (not riots) at the supreme court building this would have been symbolic. The rampant destruction of private property is just the continuation of violations on those that could have been of some source of support for the cause. I also pointed out on Twitter that with the destruction of private property running rampant in the area libertarians (and anyone else who hold a strict adherence to not do damage to others property) would do well to distance their support for these mobs. The destruction of private property will accomplish nothing but more victims of this tragedy, where as the dismantling on the government will free the people from its oppression.
(3) Mistakes were made. The city of Ferguson decided to wait until dark, 9pm their time, to release the verdict, even though it had been made earlier in the day. This was, in my mind, intentional to attain camera effect. If their statement had been made earlier in the day, after it was read in court, this would have allowed business owners to stay at their stores to protect them, this is a two edged sword though, as they could have then become victims of the rioters. This decision also guaranteed that the maximum amount of people were not at work, but in the streets. It allowed better cinematography in that fire is more visually exciting when contrasted to the dark.
(4) The State fails at it’s own monopoly. As we see from this and the prior riots (directly after the shooting) the Ferguson police cannot and will not protect and serve the people but are engaging the protesters head on. Firing rubber bullets, tear gas, rolling out armored trucks they are less concerned with the city as a whole and more concerned with directly combating the mass of people. Rakkur Crowley said it best this morning on Facebook, “The looting in Ferguson is just more evidence that the State fails abysmally in its’ claim to be the monopoly provider of property protection.”
(5) The State still wins. As I pointed out last night on Twitter, these riots set in motion the future and continuation of police militarization in these areas and across the country. When riots such as this happen it is common for the police forces to request help from other agencies, local, state and federal. This gives the impression that the department is ill equipped to handle it’s own populace. In the next few weeks, months and years watch as the Ferguson Police Department becomes more and more militarized.  And watch as the funding is poured into the “public safety” areas of that local government. The State will continue to tax these people, most likely at higher rates to offset damages and afford new services. The state will have a reason to impose new restrictions on the populace. The state will have renewed faith from some that they are the protectors of civility and social order, because in the minds of some, order comes from mandate, and social structures are built by government, that all aspects of their lives can and should be controlled “for the greater good”.
(6) Racism is still alive and well. This is brought to my mind by an image of a young black woman holding a sign that reads “Black Lives Matter”. Without going into a whole diatribe on the fact that “reverse racism” does not exist and is merely doublespeak, for a person to claim equality under law or circumstance the abstinence of using classification or separation by gender, race, creed, wealth and any other differentiation must be present. By claiming that Black Lives Matter she is making a statement that she believes that others do not hold this true. But why not just say, “Lives Matter, Stop Killing People”. Better defined as the root of the problem this statement shows a true belief in the equal treatment in all, not defined or restricted to only certain groups or classifications of people.

The entire situation is a mess, and one that will not be resolved by dispersing the people, it is an emotion, a feeling, an idea, and as has been warned before, “ One resists the invasion of armies; one does not resist the invasion of ideas.” The fact is that Ferguson is the culmination and the expected outcome of the growing problem of police abuse and authoritative overreach, it is the expected result of the growing Police State. It is for the thousands of cases of brutality that go unaired on national television and kept from the minds and eyes of the public, it is the result of a belief that “just doing my job” is a legitimate reason for abuse. This powder keg is nothing near close to burning out.

So the takeaway from all of this is as follows. A human being is dead, that is a tragedy in of itself. The state fails to provide the service they hold a monopoly on, something they extort money for. And in the end the riots and protests that are following the Grand Jury's decision will ultimately cause the government to swell in that area and beyond. 


Also See

(*) Transcripts of Grand Jury Evidence